Fragmented Communication: Users expressed frustration with the fragmented communication channels in traditional construction management processes. Important information was scattered across emails, phone calls, and physical documents, leading to misunderstandings and delays in project timelines.

Lack of Real-Time Data Access: Users, particularly project owners and supervisors, highlighted the challenge of accessing real-time project data while on-site. Without immediate access to updated plans, schedules, and progress reports, they struggled to make informed decisions and address issues promptly.

Difficulty in Collaboration: Various user personas, such as architects, subcontractors, and foremen, found it challenging to collaborate effectively due to the lack of a centralized platform. Coordinating tasks, sharing documents, and tracking changes across dispersed teams proved to be cumbersome and time-consuming.

Complexity in Document Management: Users encountered difficulties in managing and organizing project documents, drawings, and specifications. Version control issues, misplaced files, and outdated information led to confusion and errors in project execution.

Inefficient Reporting Processes: Users expressed frustration with the manual and time-consuming reporting processes involved in construction management. Generating progress reports, safety inspections, and change orders required significant administrative effort and often led to inaccuracies and delays.

Poor Mobile Experience: Users emphasized the need for a mobile-friendly solution that would allow them to access project data and collaborate with team members while on the go. Existing mobile interfaces were either non-existent or poorly optimized, hindering productivity and responsiveness.